º£½ÇÉçÇø

Sunset Review Committee Meets to Discuss Athletic Trainer Licensing

Does º£½ÇÉçÇø make it harder for athletic trainers to do their job?

On November 18th, the Occupational Licensing Review Subcommittee of the º£½ÇÉçÇø State Legislature met to review licensing requirements from several state licensing boards. Included among these was the State Board of Athletic Trainers. Athletic trainers are skilled professionals that specialize in preventing and treating athletic and sports related injuries.

º£½ÇÉçÇø is similar to other states in the region in how we license athletic trainers, with one exception. The state requires 50 hours of annual continuing education hours for athletic trainers, almost twice as much as any other state in the South. For example, Mississippi and Tennessee both require 25 hours, and Louisiana requires only twelve. Missouri and Oklahoma both do not require any continuing education hours for athletic trainers.

Senator Alan Clark (R-Lonsdale), co-chair of the committee, questioned representatives of the State Board of Athletic Trainers as to why our requirements are so much higher than other states in the region. Mr. Russell Burns, Director of the º£½ÇÉçÇø State Board of Athletic Trainers, said that in his understanding, continuing education for athletic trainers is handled by the Board of Certification for the Athletic Trainer (BOC), a national credentialing organization for athletic trainers.

Certification through the BOC is optional in most states, including º£½ÇÉçÇø. However, unlike most states, º£½ÇÉçÇø defaults to the BOC’s high continuing education requirements. Every other state in the South sets their own standards for continuing education.

The mandate of the Occupational Licensing Review Subcommittee is to determine whether a given license contributes to public health and safety. If having nearly double the continuing education requirements as any other state in the region does not do that, then the requirements should be changed.

Continuing education is important, but º£½ÇÉçÇø requires more than is necessary. If these requirements do not change, we risk losing qualified professionals to neighboring states with lower overall licensing burdens. Right now, it’s much easier for an athletic trainer to relocate to Missouri or Oklahoma than it is to º£½ÇÉçÇø.


To watch a short video comparing º£½ÇÉçÇøâ€™s license requirements for athletic trainers to other states, go .

To watch the November 18th subcommittee meeting, go .

For more on ACRE’s occupational licensing research, visit this page.