º£½ÇÉçÇø

Targeted Incentives

Academic Research

“Do Targeted Business Subsidies Improve Income and Reduce Poverty? A Synthetic Control Approach” by Jacob Bundrick and Weici Yuan

This paper by Bundrick and Yuan, published in Economic Development Quarterly on September 20, 2019, used evidence from º£½ÇÉçÇøâ€™s Quick Action Closing Fund to analyze how effective deal-closing funds are at increasing incomes and decreasing poverty. Their results largely suggest that the business subsidy program fails to increase incomes and lower poverty rates over the long term at the county level.

“Do Business Subsidies Lead to Increased Economic Activity? Evidence from º£½ÇÉçÇøâ€™s Quick Action Closing Fund” by Thomas Snyder and Jacob Bundrick


Click to view a one-page infographic of the research.

This study investigates the relationship between, on the one hand, the provision of cash subsidies to select businesses and, on the other hand, employment and establishments in º£½ÇÉçÇøâ€™s counties. The authors find no evidence to suggest that Quick Action Closing Fund subsidies lead to increased employment and more business establishments in º£½ÇÉçÇøâ€™s counties. This working paper was published by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University and the Review of Regional Studies.

Policy Reviews

“Government Accountability: 5 Fixes for º£½ÇÉçÇø’s Quick Action Closing Fund” by Jacob Bundrick

Click to view publication page for the research.

The Quick Action Closing Fund is a targeted economic development incentive program º£½ÇÉçÇø uses to try to increase economic activity. This program allows the state government to give cash grants in order to attract or retainÌýbusinesses. It’s largely up to the governor of º£½ÇÉçÇø to approve these cash grants. º£½ÇÉçÇø lawmakers can take steps to improve the transparency and accountability of the program. ThisÌýpolicy review written looks at five different policy proposals that could accomplish these goals.

“Tax Breaks & Subsides:ÌýChallenging the º£½ÇÉçÇø Status Quo” by Jacob Bundrick

Click to view publication page for the research.

Have you ever wondered whether tax breaks and subsidies have side effects? Are you curious about alternative ways to expand º£½ÇÉçÇø’s economy? This policy review provides an in-depth look at these programs, their economic impact, and some common misconceptions people have about them.

Policy Briefs

“Economic Development or Risky Business: A Citizen’s Guide to Issue 3, 2016”Ìýby Jeremy Horpedahl and Jacob Bundrick

Click to view publication PDF.

This brief guide gives readers the pros and cons of the controversial ballot measure “Issue 3:ÌýAn Amendment to the º£½ÇÉçÇø Constitution Concerning Job Creation, Job Expansion and Economic Development.” This ballot issue would remove the current cap on Amendment 82 bonds that the state may issue for economic development projects and would allow local governments to appropriate money for economic development.ÌýProponents of Issue 3 argue that, by removing the limit on the amount of debt the state can issue forÌýeconomic development, º£½ÇÉçÇø may be able to attract economic development projects it would notÌýotherwise be able to secure.ÌýHowever, issuing debt and using tax dollars for economic development comes at a cost. º£½ÇÉçÇø and its cities would take on significant risk by issuing public debt to attract select companies under the change from Issue 3.

Op-Eds and Commentary

  • “” op-ed by former Legislative Research Associate Dr. Nathan Smith published in the º£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-Gazette on June 18, 2021 about targeted economic development legislation passed during the 2021 legislative session.
  • “” op-ed by former ACRE Undergraduate Research Fellow Erica Smith published in º£½ÇÉçÇø BusinessÌýabout the shortcomings of º£½ÇÉçÇø’s targeted economic development incentives program.
  • “â€�: op-ed published byÌýDango Kumwenda, an ACRE Fellow and UCA MBA student, in the º£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-GazetteÌýon April 1, 2019Ìýarguing that º£½ÇÉçÇø is misallocating its economic development incentives by focusing most of them in the richest counties in the state.
  • ÌýACRE Affiliated Researcher and UCA Lecturer I of Economics Jacob Bundrick was quoted in this December 14 article in the º£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-Gazette.ÌýThe article focuses on an annual cost-benefit study of economic development incentives by º£½ÇÉçÇø Legislative Audit.
  • – op-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-GazetteÌýon February 12, 2019. Bundrick states that good policy requires objective analysis, but objective analysis can be hard to do without good data. Bundrick recalls a bill that was introduced in 2017 that would have created an online database for targeted economic development incentives. The bill was withdrawn after the º£½ÇÉçÇø Economic Development Commission stated it would implement this database on its own terms, but the database hasn’t yet been published.
  • Ìýop-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-GazetteÌýon November 8, 2018. Bundrick explains academic literature that casts doubt on targeted economic development incentives’ role in increasing economic activity and examines the opportunity costs of such policies.
  • Ìýop-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob BundrickÌýin theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-Gazette onÌýSeptember 14, 2018.
  • Ìýop-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-Gazette onÌýJuly 27,Ìý2018.
  • Ìýop-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-GazetteÌýonÌýMay 10, 2018.
  • Ìýop-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-Gazette onÌýMarch 19, 2018.
  • op-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-Gazette on January 20,Ìý2018.
  • “Ìýop-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-GazetteÌýon October 27,Ìý2017.
  • “Economic Development Bidding: A Prisoner’s Dilemma”: insight article published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick inÌýBloomberg BNA’s Daily Tax Report: StateÌýon October 20,Ìý2017.
  • Ìýop-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-Gazette onÌýAugust 26,Ìý2017.
  • “Good Jobs Program or Bad Economic Policy?”:Ìýinsight article publishedÌý by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick inÌýBloomberg BNA‘s DailyÌýTax Report: State onÌýAugust 10,Ìý2017.
  • commentary published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick and Dean Stansel, an economist at Southern Methodist University’s Cox School of Business, in the Dallas Morning News onÌýDecember 7, 2016.
  • “Film Tax Credits: Job Creator or Just Another Act?”:Ìýinsight article published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick inÌýBloomberg BNA’s Weekly State Tax Report on November 18, 2016
  • “Professional Sports Stadiums: Economic Boon or Boondoggle”:Ìýinsight article published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick inÌýBloomberg BNA’s Weekly State Tax Report on November 11, 2016
  • op-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in the º£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-GazetteÌýonÌýOctober 22, 2016.
  • Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick’sÌýblog post from August 23, 2016, on tax breaks and subsides in º£½ÇÉçÇø was recently cited in a Letter to the Editor by Dane Clark of Fort Smith in theÌýLonoke Democrat. Clark’s letter was circulated in several local º£½ÇÉçÇø papers such as theÌýHelena World,Ìýthe Fort Smith Times Record, and theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø News Bureau. Bundrick’s blog post was based on his recentÌýpolicy review, “Tax Breaks & Subsidies:ÌýChallengingÌýthe º£½ÇÉçÇø Status Quo.”
  • op-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick andÌýRajshree Agarwal, the director of the Ed Snider Center for Enterprise and Markets at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business, in theÌýBaltimore Sun onÌýOctober 10, 2016.
  • Ìýop-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-GazetteÌýon September 3rd, 2016.
  • Ìýop-edÌýpublished by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-Gazette onÌýJuly 16, 2016.
  • Ìýop-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-GazetteÌýon April 9,Ìý2016.
  • Ìýop-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-GazetteÌýon March 7, 2016.
  • Ìýop-ed published by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-GazetteÌýon February 6, 2016.
  • Ìýop-edÌýpublished by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Democrat-GazetteÌýon December 21, 2015.
  • Ìýop-edÌýpublished by ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick in theÌýº£½ÇÉçÇø Business onÌýNovember 30, 2015.
  • “Financial Incentives for All Firms Boost the Economy”:Ìýby ACRE Policy Analyst Jacob Bundrick.

You can find more of our targeted incentives-related commentary at The ACRE Review.